Subscribe via RSS Feed Connect on Pinterest Connect on Google Plus Connect on LinkedIn Connect on YouTube

The Genetic Engineering Baby Abyss

July 9, AD 2013 5 Comments

Baby

Catholic Free Press

In 2001 it was reported that up to 30 children were born who had been genetically altered. It was a minimal alteration. Researchers replaced women’s defective mitochondria in their eggs, the cause of infertility, with healthy mitochondria from other women. The modified eggs were fertilized in vitro (IVF) and implanted in the infertile mothers’ wombs. It was confirmed that the children, all healthy, have mitochondria, hence genes, from two mothers.

Since then there has been much debate about the ethics of producing genetically-modified children. Proponents argue that further developments can benefit the entire human race. If the genes that cause defects are replaced with healthy genes, then the human genome will eventually be rid of such defects. Opponents warn that the human genome is not understood well enough to predict how genetic modifications will affect future generations. They say that further experimentation amounts to experimenting on babies unable to give consent, and that it is a slippery slope leading to eugenics.

One might hope that the opponents win the public debate. After all, most genetic mutations are harmful, evolutionary science tells us that much. And what does society do with the unwanted children deemed bad experiments? Kill them? Store them?

However, the opponents really aren’t against treating children like subjects without their consent. They support ridding the population of genetic defects through prenatal genetic testing and abortion, which means they don’t want anyone giving birth to the unwanted. That is eugenics. What they oppose is mixing up the genome for future generations, but it’s a double standard. They’ve already slid down their slope. How can you claim to care about the human genome when you don’t care about all human life?

This month it was reported that a baby has been born, the result of a next generation gene sequencing experiment. During IVF treatment, the genes of embryos were sequenced and certain ones selected for life. They say it was only about health, but once researchers know the genetic makeup, they can try to genetically engineer and select for traits such as eye color, height, athletic ability, and intelligence too. Why not? Women and men already sell their eggs and sperm, marketed on desirable traits. People already treat children like designer commodities.

If — more like when — this happens, it is an abyss of no return. The human genome is changed forever, there’s no going back. The children of genetically-modified children can genetically modify their children, and before long children won’t just wonder who their parents and grandparents are, they won’t even know how many they have.

Subscribe by Email:
Hello, and thank you for reading. My name is Stacy Trasancos. I am a wife, mother of seven, and joyful convert to Catholicism. I write from my tiny office in a 100-year-old restored Adirondack mountain lodge that overlooks a small spring-fed lake. Read more about me here. Find me on Facebook, follow me on Twitter, or contact me by email. God bless you!
  • Jim

    But it is interesting that our free wills spiritually modify our souls.

  • Sebastian

    It is frightening beyond words. We humans are now really playing God. This never ends well. We can only hope in the Almighty bringing greater good even from this evil, and not stop trusting in Him.

  • benedict1

    The Nazi doctors are alive and well. The Sangerite Eugenics crowd is gleeful. My God, what have we unleashed? I have blithely lived my life the last decade unmindful of this horror.

    Stacy, I am also struck by the intersection of this information with your piece, “Let Us Do Science Together.” In it the neutral notion of “….Science must pursue the truth……”, and perhaps, implied only to me, “….. whatever the result….” is clearly included.

    I will probably be beat about the head and shoulders verbally for this but the present article previews a future so ghastly I would have to say Enough! Stop this line of inquiry and these experiments. Or, do we prefer a Dr. Frankenstein future for our children? This post probably sounds like babble but I have never even heard of this until this morning and I cannot absorb its full portent. I am stunned. Signed, A Sad and Frightened Old Man.

  • Pingback: What will the Catholic Church be like in A. D. 2,978? - BigPulpit.com

  • Richard E.

    When I read this it made me realize that the fictional work “Brave New World” was/is becoming a reality.
    Richard